FOLIO ADJUDICATION 2003 by Jackie Wills
The
poems which have been selected as winners of this competition emerged very
early on in my reading of the entries. The winner stood out straight away, as
did those which were commended. What has been interesting is realising how many
poems which competed for inclusion in the anthology and for these other
positions came from the same writers. It was hard to select, in some cases,
which poem from a good group should appear.
I
hope I've been fair. Any selection is subjective. My own tastes are generally
for simplicity of image and thought, not too much clutter. I can't over
emphasise the importance of the emotional drive in a poem. Too much
contemporary poetry has no emotional life, it's tricksy, clever, displays its
verbosity and reads more like a crossword puzzle.
So
the poems I've selected had an impact on me, emotionally, too. They were poems
which came back to me as I did the washing up and went to pick up my kids from
school. And of course, as I went through the list to write comments, they were
the poems I remembered from earlier readings.
I
was impressed, overall, by the poems submitted. There was evidence that people
read contemporary poetry, that the writers are in touch with what else is going
on. I'd warn against too many poems written in response to paintings or views.
I think poems work better if they demand to be written or if they're sat on for
a while!
There
is a range of styles in the anthology - lyrical, cynical, humorous,
contemplative. There are monologues in historical voices, there are domestic
scenes, there is death, illness, the noise of children and a festival, a rogue
tractor driver and a talking stag.
I like diversity in poetry. I think we should
embrace a range of styles. In this competition, the clear voices which take
risks with ideas are the ones which spoke to me.
Jackie Wills